# Round 1 Context Brief ## Round 0 Summary 12 experts analyzed the UKFS specification. Key findings: ### Emerging Consensus 1. **Naming Convention**: Symlink aliases providing both forms (e/ AND entities/) is gaining support 2. **Relation Modeling**: Reification for n-ary + canonical ordering for symmetric + `--` delimiter instead of `+` 3. **Scalability**: Hash-prefix sharding (e/person/a8/alice/) + secondary index files 4. **Event Entity Type**: Add /e/event/ as first-class type 5. **Schema Layer**: Add /.schema/ for type definitions ### Open Tensions Requiring Resolution | ID | Tension | Key Question | |----|---------|--------------| | T01 | Single-char vs full names | Lock the naming decision | | T04 | Binary relations insufficient | Confirm reification approach | | T05 | Closed entity types | Define extensibility mechanism | | T08 | Determinism vs semantic ambiguity | Clarify what "deterministic" means | | T14 | No implementation evidence | Define proof-of-concept scope | ### Key Perspectives from Round 0 - **Muffin**: "Single-char roots are correct. Hash-prefix sharding for scale. Relations should be directories, not files." - **Cupcake**: "Add Event entity type. Use reification for n-ary relations. Define extensibility via /_custom/." - **Eclair**: "Provide symlink aliases for both forms. Require MANIFEST.md in each directory." - **Brioche**: "Add relation index manifests per entity. Define state semantics explicitly." - **Cannoli**: "Canonical lexicographic ordering for symmetric relations. Accept O(n) scan cost for attributes." - **Beignet**: "Adopt faceted auxiliary layer (/f/). Implement authority control for synonyms." - **Churro**: "Prove it first. Define anti-goals. Determinism claim is overstated." ### Round 1 Objectives 1. **Lock T01**: Decide naming convention (single-char canonical + symlink aliases?) 2. **Lock T04**: Confirm relation modeling (reification + `--` delimiter + canonical ordering?) 3. **Lock T05**: Define extensibility (/_custom/? /f/ facets? Both?) 4. **Address T08**: Reframe "deterministic" claim accurately 5. **Address T14**: Define minimum viable proof-of-concept Experts should build on Round 0 insights and drive toward convergence on these decisions.