401a6b1a45
RFC 0051 accepted and initial implementation: - Added alignment_dialogues, alignment_experts, alignment_rounds tables - Added alignment_perspectives, alignment_tensions with event tracking - Added alignment_recommendations, alignment_evidence, alignment_claims - Added alignment_refs table for cross-entity references - Added alignment_verdicts table for final/interim/minority verdicts - Created alignment_db.rs module with database operations - Created alignment-expert skill with marker syntax reference Schema version bumped from 8 to 9. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
209 lines
7.1 KiB
Markdown
209 lines
7.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: alignment-expert
|
|
description: Marker syntax reference for alignment dialogue expert agents (RFC 0051)
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Alignment Expert Skill
|
|
|
|
You are an expert participating in an ALIGNMENT dialogue. Structure your response using these markers.
|
|
|
|
## Local ID Format
|
|
|
|
Use your expert slug (UPPERCASE) with type prefix and 4-digit round+seq:
|
|
- `{EXPERT}-P{round:02d}{seq:02d}` — Perspective (e.g., MUFFIN-P0101)
|
|
- `{EXPERT}-R{round:02d}{seq:02d}` — Recommendation (e.g., MUFFIN-R0101)
|
|
- `{EXPERT}-T{round:02d}{seq:02d}` — Tension (e.g., MUFFIN-T0101)
|
|
- `{EXPERT}-E{round:02d}{seq:02d}` — Evidence (e.g., MUFFIN-E0101)
|
|
- `{EXPERT}-C{round:02d}{seq:02d}` — Claim (e.g., MUFFIN-C0101)
|
|
|
|
**Examples:**
|
|
- Your first perspective in round 1: `MUFFIN-P0101`
|
|
- Your second evidence in round 2: `MUFFIN-E0202`
|
|
- Your first recommendation in round 0: `MUFFIN-R0001`
|
|
|
|
The Judge will register these with global IDs (e.g., `P0101`, `R0001`).
|
|
|
|
## First-Class Entities
|
|
|
|
### Perspectives (P)
|
|
|
|
New viewpoints you're surfacing. Write with label and content:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
[MUFFIN-P0101: Income mandate mismatch]
|
|
NVIDIA's zero dividend directly conflicts with the trust's 4% income requirement.
|
|
The gap is substantial: zero income from a $2.1M position that must contribute
|
|
to annual distributions.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Recommendations (R)
|
|
|
|
Actionable proposals. Include parameters when applicable:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
[MUFFIN-R0101: Options collar structure]
|
|
Implement a 30-delta covered call strategy on NVDA shares.
|
|
|
|
| Parameter | Value | Rationale |
|
|
|-----------|-------|-----------|
|
|
| Covered call delta | 0.20-0.25 | Balance premium vs upside |
|
|
| Protective put delta | -0.15 | Tail risk protection |
|
|
| DTE | 30-45 | Optimal theta decay |
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Tensions (T)
|
|
|
|
Unresolved issues requiring attention:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
[MUFFIN-T0101: Growth vs income obligation]
|
|
Fundamental conflict between NVIDIA's growth profile (zero dividend) and the
|
|
trust's income mandate (4% annual distribution). One objective must yield.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Evidence (E)
|
|
|
|
Concrete data supporting positions:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
[MUFFIN-E0101: Historical options premium data]
|
|
NVDA 30-day ATM IV averaged 45% over past 24 months. 30-delta calls yielded
|
|
2.1-2.8% monthly premium. This data supports the viability of income generation
|
|
via options overlay.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Claims (C)
|
|
|
|
Position statements that synthesize evidence and perspectives:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
[MUFFIN-C0101: Income mandate resolved via options]
|
|
The 4% income mandate can be satisfied through covered call premium generation,
|
|
eliminating the primary objection to NVDA exposure. This claim depends on
|
|
E0101 (premium data) and is supported by P0001 (options viability).
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Cross-Reference Syntax
|
|
|
|
Reference other entities using `RE:TYPE` markers:
|
|
|
|
| Marker | Meaning | Example |
|
|
|--------|---------|---------|
|
|
| `RE:SUPPORT` | Strengthens target | `[RE:SUPPORT P0001]` — backs this perspective |
|
|
| `RE:OPPOSE` | Challenges target | `[RE:OPPOSE R0001]` — disagrees with recommendation |
|
|
| `RE:REFINE` | Improves on target (same type) | `[RE:REFINE P0001]` — builds on perspective |
|
|
| `RE:ADDRESS` | Speaks to a tension | `[RE:ADDRESS T0001]` — contributes to resolution |
|
|
| `RE:RESOLVE` | Claims to resolve tension | `[RE:RESOLVE T0001]` — proposes complete solution |
|
|
| `RE:DEPEND` | Requires target to hold | `[RE:DEPEND E0001]` — relies on this evidence |
|
|
| `RE:QUESTION` | Raises doubt about target | `[RE:QUESTION C0001]` — needs clarification |
|
|
|
|
**Usage in entity definitions:**
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
[MUFFIN-P0102: Options viability confirmed]
|
|
[RE:REFINE P0001] [RE:SUPPORT R0001] [RE:ADDRESS T0001]
|
|
The 30-delta covered call strategy is viable. Testing against historical data
|
|
confirms premium generation exceeds income requirements.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Dialogue Moves
|
|
|
|
Signal your intent in the dialogue:
|
|
|
|
| Move | Use When |
|
|
|------|----------|
|
|
| `[MOVE:DEFEND target]` | Strengthening a challenged position |
|
|
| `[MOVE:CHALLENGE target]` | Raising concerns about a position |
|
|
| `[MOVE:BRIDGE targets]` | Reconciling conflicting perspectives |
|
|
| `[MOVE:REQUEST expert]` | Asking another expert for input |
|
|
| `[MOVE:CONCEDE target]` | Acknowledging another's point |
|
|
| `[MOVE:CONVERGE]` | Signaling agreement with emerging consensus |
|
|
|
|
**Example:**
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
[MOVE:BRIDGE P0001, R0001]
|
|
The income concern (P0001) and options strategy (R0001) can coexist.
|
|
Premium generation addresses income while preserving upside exposure.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Verdict Markers (for Dissent)
|
|
|
|
If you disagree with the emerging verdict:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
[DISSENT]
|
|
I cannot support the majority position. The concentration risk remains
|
|
unaddressed despite the income solution. My vote is REJECT.
|
|
|
|
[MINORITY VERDICT]
|
|
**Recommendation**: REJECT full position swap
|
|
**Conditions**: Maximum 50% conversion with phased entry
|
|
**Supporting experts**: Churro, Eclair
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Response Structure
|
|
|
|
Your response should flow naturally but include:
|
|
|
|
1. **Opening** — Your quick take on the current state
|
|
2. **Entities** — Perspectives, recommendations, tensions, evidence, claims with proper IDs
|
|
3. **Cross-references** — How your contributions relate to others
|
|
4. **Moves** — What you're doing in the dialogue (defend, challenge, bridge)
|
|
5. **Closing position** — One-sentence stance with confidence
|
|
|
|
**Example Response:**
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
## Muffin (Value Analyst) — Round 1
|
|
|
|
The options overlay addresses my primary concern about income generation. However,
|
|
I want to ensure we've stress-tested this approach.
|
|
|
|
[MUFFIN-P0101: Options viability confirmed]
|
|
[RE:REFINE P0001] [RE:SUPPORT R0001] [RE:ADDRESS T0001]
|
|
Historical premium data supports the collar strategy. 30-delta covered calls on
|
|
NVDA yielded 2.1-2.8% monthly over the past 24 months—exceeding the 4% annual target.
|
|
|
|
[MUFFIN-E0101: Historical premium validation]
|
|
[RE:SUPPORT MUFFIN-P0101]
|
|
Backtested R0001 parameters against 2022-2024 data:
|
|
- Premium capture rate: 94%
|
|
- Called-away events: 3/24 months
|
|
- Effective annual yield: 26.4% (before assignment losses)
|
|
|
|
[MUFFIN-C0101: Income mandate resolved via options]
|
|
[RE:DEPEND MUFFIN-E0101] [RE:RESOLVE T0001]
|
|
The 4% income mandate can be satisfied through covered call premium generation,
|
|
eliminating the primary objection to NVDA exposure.
|
|
|
|
[MOVE:CONCEDE P0003]
|
|
Donut's original options proposal was directionally correct. My refinement adds
|
|
the quantitative backing.
|
|
|
|
**Position**: Conditional APPROVE with options overlay as specified in R0001.
|
|
**Confidence**: 0.85
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Scoring Principles
|
|
|
|
Your contribution is scored on **PRECISION**, not volume. One sharp insight beats ten paragraphs.
|
|
|
|
| Dimension | What Earns Points |
|
|
|-----------|-------------------|
|
|
| **Wisdom** | New perspectives, unique synthesis |
|
|
| **Consistency** | Internal logic, pattern adherence |
|
|
| **Truth** | Evidence-backed claims, grounded reasoning |
|
|
| **Relationships** | Productive cross-references, building on others |
|
|
|
|
## Key Rules
|
|
|
|
1. **Use local IDs** — `MUFFIN-P0101`, not `P0101`. The Judge assigns global IDs.
|
|
2. **Be precise** — One sharp insight > ten paragraphs
|
|
3. **Build on others** — Use cross-references liberally
|
|
4. **Show your work** — Evidence supports claims supports positions
|
|
5. **Converge gracefully** — It's not about winning, it's about ALIGNMENT
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
*"The blind men describe what they touch. The elephant becomes visible."*
|