blue/.blue/dialogues/2026-02-06T1839Z-rfc-0058-supersession-hybrid-relational-dynamodb-architecture/round-3.summary.md
Eric Garcia 6e8f0db6c0 chore: add dialogues, RFCs, docs and minor improvements
- Add dialogue prompt file writing for audit/debugging
- Update README install instructions
- Add new RFCs (0053, 0055-0059, 0062)
- Add recorded dialogues and expert pools
- Add ADR 0018 dynamodb-portable-schema
- Update TODO with hook configuration notes

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 08:51:56 -05:00

1.5 KiB

Round 3 Summary — Convergence Round

Result: 100% Convergence

All 6 experts signaled [MOVE:CONVERGE]. Zero new tensions. Zero new divergent perspectives. Velocity = 0.

Final Resolutions

Expert Action Signal
Croissant Resolved Strudel R2-T01 (graph assembly = shared library above trait) [MOVE:CONVERGE]
Strudel Conceded refs table to Cannoli (cleartext items cheaper for mutations) [MOVE:CONVERGE]
Galette Confirmed machine-verifiable exit gates (greppable + dual-impl CI) [MOVE:CONVERGE]
Tartlet Confirmed AAD portability in Phase B, deferred hash chain to Phase C [MOVE:CONVERGE]
Cannoli Confirmed refs disagreement is Phase C detail, both designs equivalent [MOVE:CONVERGE]
Muffin Confirmed denormalization elimination is correct for both backends [MOVE:CONVERGE]

Last Disagreement Resolved

Refs table design (Strudel vs Cannoli):

  • Strudel conceded Cannoli's position (separate cleartext ref items avoid re-sealing encrypted payloads on edge mutation)
  • Both agreed the choice is a Phase C implementation detail, not an architectural blocker
  • Both produce identical behavior under full-partition-load + in-memory assembly

Muffin's Final Move

The pro-relational architect who started this dialogue arguing for PostgreSQL ended it by confirming that eliminating verdict denormalization "is not a compromise -- it is the correct normalization decision for both backends." This is the clearest signal that the panel has genuinely converged rather than simply fatigued.