Emerged from alignment dialogue with 5 experts (unanimous convergence). Problem: guard command runs async within tokio::main, causing hangs when invoked from Claude Code hooks. Solution: Run guard synchronously before tokio runtime initialization. Pre-init gates should not depend on post-init infrastructure. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
4.2 KiB
RFC 0049: Synchronous Guard Command
Status: Draft Created: 2026-02-01 Author: 💙 Judge (via alignment dialogue) Related: RFC 0038 (SDLC Workflow Discipline)
Problem Statement
The blue guard command validates file writes against worktree rules (RFC 0038). Currently it runs as an async function within #[tokio::main], which causes hanging issues when invoked from Claude Code PreToolUse hooks.
Root Cause
The guard command performs only synchronous operations:
- Environment variable checks (
BLUE_BYPASS_WORKTREE) - Path pattern matching (allowlist)
- Filesystem reads (
.gitfile/directory) - Subprocess execution (
git branch --show-current)
None of these require async, but the tokio runtime initialization adds:
- Thread pool creation overhead
- Potential resource contention in hook contexts
- Failure modes when spawned from non-tokio parent processes
Current Workaround
The guard hook script uses a full path to the binary and closes stdin:
/Users/ericg/letemcook/blue/target/release/blue guard --path="$FILE_PATH" </dev/null
This works but is fragile (hardcoded path) and doesn't address the architectural issue.
Proposed Solution
Run the guard command synchronously before tokio runtime initialization.
Implementation
fn main() {
// Fast-path: handle guard before tokio
if let Some(exit_code) = maybe_handle_guard() {
std::process::exit(exit_code);
}
// Normal path: tokio runtime for everything else
tokio_main();
}
fn maybe_handle_guard() -> Option<i32> {
let args: Vec<String> = std::env::args().collect();
if args.len() >= 2 && args[1] == "guard" {
let path = args.iter()
.find(|a| a.starts_with("--path="))
.map(|a| &a[7..]);
if let Some(path) = path {
return Some(run_guard_sync(path));
}
}
None
}
fn run_guard_sync(path: &str) -> i32 {
// Synchronous implementation of guard logic
// No tokio, no tracing, just the check
// ...
}
#[tokio::main]
async fn tokio_main() -> Result<()> {
// Existing async main logic
}
Benefits
- Eliminates hanging: No tokio runtime to initialize
- Faster execution: Microseconds instead of milliseconds
- Simpler hook integration: No stdin/stdout complexity
- Correct architecture: Pre-init gates don't depend on post-init infrastructure
Changes Required
- Add
maybe_handle_guard()function inapps/blue-cli/src/main.rs - Implement
run_guard_sync()with same logic as current async version - Update hook script to use simple
blue guard --path="$FILE_PATH" - Remove hardcoded binary path from hook
Alignment Dialogue
This RFC emerged from an alignment dialogue with 5 experts. Key insights:
| Expert | Perspective |
|---|---|
| 🧁 Muffin (Systems Architect) | Pre-init gates must not depend on post-init infrastructure |
| 🧁 Cupcake (CLI UX Designer) | Fast-path validation gains nothing from async |
| 🧁 Scone (DevOps Engineer) | Hook context resource starvation avoided with sync |
| 🧁 Eclair (Security Analyst) | Sync prevents runtime initialization deadlock |
| 🧁 Donut (Minimalist) | Guard has no actual async work - signature is misleading |
Convergence: Unanimous in Round 0. All experts independently concluded guard should be synchronous.
Open Questions
-
Future extensibility: What if guard needs to call daemon APIs later?
- Answer: Create a separate async guard command (e.g.,
blue guard-async) if needed
- Answer: Create a separate async guard command (e.g.,
-
Pattern consistency: This makes guard an exception to async-first design
- Answer: Pre-flight validation is a legitimate exception case
Implementation Plan
- Add
maybe_handle_guard()pre-tokio check - Implement
run_guard_sync()with current logic - Add
is_in_allowlist_sync()helper - Add
is_source_code_path_sync()helper - Update hook script to remove full path
- Test hook with simplified invocation
- Remove workaround code
References
- RFC 0038: SDLC Workflow Discipline (introduced guard command)
- ADR 0014: Alignment Dialogue Agents (used to deliberate this RFC)
- Dialogue:
2026-02-01T2214Z-guard-command-architecture.dialogue.recorded.md